[Health promotion and overweight prevention-a systematic evaluation of available information materials with a focus on risk groups].
Clicks: 426
ID: 61606
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
74.4
/100
426 views
277 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #3 of 10 articles by views in bundesgesundheitsblatt, gesundheitsforschung, gesundheitsschutz
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Children and adolescents from families with a migration background and/or low social status belong to risk groups for the development of overweight. At the same time, they are considered difficult to approach for health promotion. This paper aims to provide an overview of freely available print and web-based materials on health promotion and to evaluate these in terms of formal, content-related, and target-group-specific criteria.From August to September 2017, print media and websites were screened using systematic keyword searches in a large search engine. Search results were evaluated by an evidence-based catalogue of criteria and rated by comparative analysis. Health apps freely available from an app store were investigated, tested, and evaluated descriptively.Eighty-nine print media, 58 websites and 32 apps were found. Of the print media items, 11.2% are available in different languages; in 29% culturally sensitive aspects are considered and in 12.4% the material makes use of clear, nontechnical language. In 40.6% of the websites, either another language can be chosen or foreign language downloads are available. Most common are translations into English (37.5%), Turkish (31.3%), Arabic (28.1%), and Russian (25%). In 37.5% of the websites, the material addresses culturally sensitive aspects. From the tested apps (n = 25), only a few qualitatively high-ranked ones are aimed at parents and pregnant women and these are often text-based and exclusively available in German.Only few informational materials are directly oriented to the everyday world of risk groups. For this target group, material drawn up in clear language with multiple translations as well as with culturally adapted designs is recommended.
| Reference Key |
brauchmann2019healthbundesgesundheitsblatt
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Brauchmann, Jana;Hruschka, Laura;Baer, Nadja-Raphaela;Jödicke, Birgit;Urlen, Marc;Wiegand, Susanna;Schenk, Liane; |
| Journal | bundesgesundheitsblatt, gesundheitsforschung, gesundheitsschutz |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1007/s00103-019-03031-8
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.