[Comparative studies of oral "quick-release" and "slowrelease" iron preparations in the postabsorption serum iron concentration test].

Clicks: 252
ID: 61438
1975
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Star

Ranked #1 of 3 articles by views in arzneimittel-forschung

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
In Heilmeyer's iron-loading test the iron preparation SA (Eryfer) proved greatly superior to a commercially available effervescent tablet (iron preparation SC), to an iron preparation in a sustained release from (iron preparation SD) and to an iron preparation in the form of enteric-coated pellets (iron preparation SE), in producing and maintaining an increased serum iron level. As compared to a sodium bicarbonate-free preparation (iron preparation SB) the iron preparation SA must be considered equivalent. The results of our investigations made with iron preparation SA are supported by experiences made by other authors with therapeutic application.
Reference Key
kilchling1975comparativearzneimittelforschung Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Kilchling, H;
Journal arzneimittel-forschung
Year 1975
DOI
DOI not found
URL URL not found
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.