A Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Patients With Acute Spinal Cord Injury: Recommendations on the Type and Timing of Rehabilitation.
Clicks: 448
ID: 61293
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Star Article
77.7
/100
448 views
312 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
StarRanked #1 of 8 articles by views in global spine journal
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The objective of this study is to develop guidelines that outline the appropriate type and timing of rehabilitation in patients with acute spinal cord injury (SCI).A systematic review of the literature was conducted to address key questions related to rehabilitation in patients with acute SCI. A multidisciplinary guideline development group used this information, and their clinical expertise, to develop recommendations for the type and timing of rehabilitation. Based on GRADE (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation), a strong recommendation is worded as "we recommend," whereas a weaker recommendation is indicated by "we suggest.Based on the findings from the systematic review, our recommendations were: (1) We suggest rehabilitation be offered to patients with acute spinal cord injury when they are medically stable and can tolerate required rehabilitation intensity (no included studies; expert opinion); (2) We suggest body weight-supported treadmill training as an option for ambulation training in addition to conventional overground walking, dependent on resource availability, context, and local expertise (low evidence); (3) We suggest that individuals with acute and subacute cervical SCI be offered functional electrical stimulation as an option to improve hand and upper extremity function (low evidence); and (4) Based on the absence of any clear benefit, we suggest not offering additional training in unsupported sitting beyond what is currently incorporated in standard rehabilitation (low evidence).These guidelines should be implemented into clinical practice to improve outcomes and reduce morbidity in patients with SCI by promoting standardization of care, decreasing the heterogeneity of management strategies and encouraging clinicians to make evidence-informed decisions.
| Reference Key |
fehlings2017aglobal
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Fehlings, Michael G;Tetreault, Lindsay A;Aarabi, Bizhan;Anderson, Paul;Arnold, Paul M;Brodke, Darrel S;Chiba, Kazuhiro;Dettori, Joseph R;Furlan, Julio C;Harrop, James S;Hawryluk, Gregory;Holly, Langston T;Howley, Susan;Jeji, Tara;Kalsi-Ryan, Sukhvinder;Kotter, Mark;Kurpad, Shekar;Kwon, Brian K;Marino, Ralph J;Martin, Allan R;Massicotte, Eric;Merli, Geno;Middleton, James W;Nakashima, Hiroaki;Nagoshi, Narihito;Palmieri, Katherine;Singh, Anoushka;Skelly, Andrea C;Tsai, Eve C;Vaccaro, Alexander;Wilson, Jefferson R;Yee, Albert;Burns, Anthony S; |
| Journal | global spine journal |
| Year | 2017 |
| DOI |
10.1177/2192568217701910
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.