Decision-making: Be wary of 'ethical' artificial intelligence
Clicks: 74
ID: 60987
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
40.7
/100
74 views
58 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #326 of 375 articles by views in Nature
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 375 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract is not available for this article.
Login to Search Abstract
| Reference Key |
stocker2016decisionmakingnature
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Stocker, M. |
| Journal | Nature |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
10.1038/540525b
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.