Which is the most effective pristine graphene electrode for energy storage devices: aerogel or xerogel?

Clicks: 236
ID: 60099
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
The morphological design of graphene materials is definitely important since their electrochemical properties as an electrode in energy storage devices are mainly dominated by their charge accessibility and active area. In this work, we present a systematic investigation on the prospects of a pristine graphene aerogel and a pristine graphene xerogel as electrode materials for both supercapacitors and lithium-ion batteries. We confirm that the graphene aerogel has a significantly higher surface area, needed for effective charge storage, than the xerogel, which offers a clear advantage for supercapacitors. In terms of battery performance, the quality of the pristine graphene raw materials is a more critical factor than their shape owing to the lithium intercalation mechanism. As a result, the graphene aerogel supercapacitors exhibited a specific capacitance of about 700 F g-1 at 10 mV s-1 in 1 M LiPF6 electrolyte, which is 3.6 times higher than the values for the xerogel devices. On the other hand, the electrochemical battery performances of the graphene aerogel and xerogel show no significant difference considering their high specific capacity of about 380 mA h g-1 at 1C. Further, the surface control kinetics of the graphene aerogel are much more dominant in the supercapacitor and battery applications than those of the xerogel. This study provides more practical approaches in order to design electrodes using lightweight, high-performance, and low-cost materials for the effective use of energy storage systems.
Reference Key
jung2019whichnanoscale Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Jung, Sung Mi;Kim, Dong Won;Jung, Hyun Young;
Journal Nanoscale
Year 2019
DOI
10.1039/c9nr06898h
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.