Environmental Impact of Textile Reinforced Concrete Facades Compared to Conventional Solutions-LCA Case Study.

Clicks: 391
ID: 60091
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #46 of 812 articles by views in Materials (Basel, Switzerland)

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 812 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Pitch-faced concrete is becoming a very popular element of modern architecture in the 21st century. In particular, the demand for concrete facades is increasing globally. On the other hand, climate change, environmental degradation, and limited resources are motivations for sustainable building materials. The construction industry is one the highest emitters of CO and other greenhouse gases, in which concrete plays a major role. Thus, reduction in the volume of concrete consumption is essential to control greenhouse gases. One approach to this problem is to use textile reinforced concrete (TRC). The main aim of the present study was to compare the subtle TRC facade made of three different types of technical textile rovings (glass, carbon, and basalt) with ordinary facades reinforced by steel reinforcement (ORC). The goal was to compare the basic environmental impact potential according to product category rules (PCR) for concrete structures. The functional unit was defined as an experimental facade with an area of 60 m and a 100-year lifespan. Inventory data were elaborated for concrete, steel, and textile fiber production; the building site; service life; demolition; and final disposal. The main life cycle assessment (LCA) parameters were global warming potential (GWP), ozone depletion (ODP), acidification (AP), eutrophication (EP), abiotic depletion (ADP), and photochemical oxidant creation (POCP). All the data used in the work were related to Czech Republic. Textile reinforced concrete facades appeared to be more environmentally friendly in four of six impact categories by an average of 30%. The results of the present study revealed that, in comparison to ORC, TRC has a lower environmental impact for the given conditions and thus good potential for use in sustainable construction.
Reference Key
laiblov2019environmentalmaterials Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Laiblová, Lenka;Pešta, Jan;Kumar, Anuj;Hájek, Petr;Fiala, Ctislav;Vlach, Tomáš;Kočí, Vladimír;
Journal Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
Year 2019
DOI
E3194
URL
Keywords
life cycle assessment (lca) environmental impact ar-glass fibers basalt fibers high performance concrete (hpc), carbon fibers textile reinforced concrete (trc)

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.