Changing expectations for board oversight of healthcare quality: the emerging paradigm.
Clicks: 263
ID: 59460
2009
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
4.8
/100
16 views
16 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Within healthcare institutions, leadership is an essential driver of expectations, performance, and culture. Yet boards of directors traditionally played a limited role in overseeing healthcare quality, providing final approval of credentialing decisions but deferring to the medical staff to set standards for the institution. Case law and standards provide little guidance for board performance in overseeing quality of care. Recent developments--the availability of comparative quality data, public reporting, and financial incentives for higher quality--have transformed expectations for board oversight. Enforcement of fraud and abuse laws based on poor quality of care, as well as federal standards for board oversight of healthcare quality and compliance, have set higher standards for board conduct. This article examines the emerging paradigm for board oversight of healthcare quality, and recommends how boards should proceed to meet their responsibilities in an era of comparative quality measures and transparency.
| Reference Key |
miller2009changingjournal
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Miller, Tracy E;Gutmann, Valerie L; |
| Journal | journal of health & life sciences law |
| Year | 2009 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | URL not found |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.