Comparison and analysis of lncRNA-mediated ceRNA regulation in different molecular subtypes of glioblastoma.
Clicks: 462
ID: 58860
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
83.0
/100
462 views
315 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #1 of 2 articles by views in molecular omics
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most malignant brain tumor with a poor prognosis. A molecular level classification of GBM can provide insight into accurate patient-specific treatment. Competitive endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs), such as long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), play an essential role in the development of tumors and are associated with survival. However, the pattern of lncRNA-mediated ceRNA (LMce) crosstalk in different GBM subtypes is still unclear. In this study, we present a computational cascade to construct LMce networks of different GBM subtypes and investigate the lncRNA-mRNA regulations among them. Our results showed that although most lncRNAs and mRNAs in the different GBM subtype networks were the same, the regulation relationships of these RNAs were different among subtypes. 42.5%, 50.9%, 43.5% and 65.0% lncRNA-mRNA regulatory pairs were classic (CL)-, mesenchymal (MES)-, proneural (PN)- and neural (NE)-specific. In addition, our study identified 61, 132, 24 and 16 modules in which lncRNAs and mRNAs synergically competed with each other for miRNAs as CL-, MES-, PN- and NE-specific. CL- and MES-specific modules were mainly involved in biological functions such as cell proliferation, apoptosis and migration, while PN- and NE-specific modules were mainly related to DNA damage and cell cycle dysregulation. Survival analysis demonstrated that some modules could be potential prognostic markers of patients of CL and MES subtypes. This study uncovered the LMce interaction patterns in different GBM subtypes, identified subtype-specific modules with distinct biological functions, and revealed the potential prognostic markers of patients of different GBM subtypes. These results might contribute to the discovery of the GBM prognostic biomarkers and development of a more accurate therapeutic process.
| Reference Key |
li2019comparisonmolecular
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Li, Qianpeng;Yu, Qiuhong;Ji, Jianghuai;Wang, Peng;Li, Dongguo; |
| Journal | molecular omics |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1039/c9mo00126c
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.