Dosimetric Factors Related to Radiation Necrosis after Five Fraction Radiosurgery for Patients with Resected Brain Metastases.

Clicks: 343
ID: 58852
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #5 of 9 articles by views in Practical radiation oncology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) is increasingly utilized in the management of patients with resected brain metastases (rBM). A significant complication of this therapy can be radiation necrosis (RN). Despite radiation (RT) dose de-escalation and the delivery of several rather than a single dose fraction, rates of RN after SRS for rBM remain high. We evaluated the dosimetric parameters associated with radiographic RN for rBM.From 2008-2016, 55 rBM at a single institution that were treated post-operatively with five-fraction linear accelerator based SRS (25-35Gy) with minimum 3 months follow-up were evaluated. For each lesion, variables recorded included RT dose to normal brain, location/magnitude of hot spots, CTV, and margin size. Hot spot location was stratified as within the tumor bed alone (CTV) or within the PTV expansion margin volume (PTV minus CTV). Cumulative incidence with competing risks was used to estimate rates of RN and local recurrence (LR). Optimal cut-points predicting for RN for hotspot magnitude based on location were identified via maximization of the log-rank test statistic.Median age for all patients was 58.5 years. For all targets, the median CTV was 17.53 cc, the median expansion margin to PTV was 2 mm, and the median max hotspot was 111%. At 1 year, cumulative incidence of radiographic RN was 18.2%. Univariate analysis showed max hot spot (hazard ratio (HR): 3.28, p=0.045), volume of the hot spots within PTV expansion margin of relative magnitude 105%, 110%, 111%, and absolute magnitude 33.5Gy predicted for RN (p=0.029, p=0.04, p=0.038, and p=0.0488 respectively), but hot spots within the CTV did not.To our knowledge, this is the first study that investigated dosimetric factors that predict for RN after five-fraction hypofractionated SRS for rBM. Hot spot location and magnitude appear important for predicting RN risk, suggesting these parameters should be carefully considered during treatment planning.
Reference Key
tanenbaum2019dosimetricpractical Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Tanenbaum, Daniel G;Buchwald, Zachary S;Jhaveri, Jaymin;Schreibmann, Eduard;Switchenko, Jeffrey M;Prabhu, Roshan S;Chowdhary, Mudit;Abugidieri, Mustafa;Pfister, Neil T;Eaton, Bree;Kahn, Shannon E;Olson, Jeffrey J;Shu, Hui-Kuo G;Crocker, Ian R;Curran, Walter J;Patel, Kirtesh R;
Journal Practical radiation oncology
Year 2019
DOI
S1879-8500(19)30278-4
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.