Relationship between physiological indices and aerobic performance tests in short and medium term of elite cyclists
Clicks: 433
ID: 58685
2013
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
76.8
/100
433 views
302 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #2 of 5 articles by views in revista brasileira de cineantropometria e desempenho humano
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Few studies allow usto verify which physiological responses are associated with performance in anational elite cycling group. Therefore, this study aimed to determine and correlate various physiological and aerobic indices with performance in 4 and 20 km time trials in high-level cyclists. The sample consisted of 14 male professional cyclists of the national elite group (28.5 ± 4.7 years old, 73.47 ± 8.29 kg, 176 ± 6.76cm), who performed a progressive test in laboratory to determine maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max: 62.23 ± 8.28 ml•kg-1•min-1), intensity relative to VO2max(iVO2max: 500.83 ± 58.65w), movement economy (EM: 0.1166 ± 0.0362 ml•kg•min•w-1), and the first and second ventilatory threshold (LV1: 348.21 ±43.26 w; LV2: 417.86 ± 60.79 w, respectively). They also performed two time trial performance tests of 4 and 20km. For the correlation between physiological indices and trial performance, Pearson correlation coefficient(p< 0.05) was used. No correlation was found between the physiological indices (VO2max absolute and relative, iVO2max, EM, LV1 and LV2) andperformance in 4 km (r= 0.38; 0.16; -0.33; 0.20; -0.50; -0.20, respectively)and 20 km (r= 0.24; 0.01; -0.13; -0.12; -0.48; -0.19, respectively) time trialin high level athletes. These results suggest that these variables are not able to explain the performance in time trials in the respective lengths, probably due to the subjects’ homogeneity.
| Reference Key |
sangali2013brelationshiprevista
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Sangali, Eduardo Bernardo;Campos, Eduardo Zapaterra;Gobbo, Luigi Agostini;Andrade, Vitor Luiz de;Papoti, Marcelo;Junior, Ismael Forte Freitas;Figueira, Tiago Rezende;Junior, Pedro Balikian; |
| Journal | revista brasileira de cineantropometria e desempenho humano |
| Year | 2013 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.