Outcome after pancreatectomy for neuroendocrine neoplams according to the WHO 2017 grading system: A retrospective multicentric analysis of 138 consecutive patients.
Clicks: 369
ID: 58508
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Star Article
69.1
/100
369 views
251 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
StarRanked #1 of 2 articles by views in clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the new World Health Organization (WHO) 2017 grading system and the others clinicopathological factors in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (panNET) operated patients.Histological staging was based on the WHO 2017 grading system. Outcome after surgery and predictors of overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) were evaluated.A total of 138 patients underwent surgical resection with a severe morbidity and mortality rates of 14.5% and 0.7% respectively. Five years OS differed according to WHO 2017: 95% among 58 patients with NETG1, 82% in 68 patients with NETG2, 35% in 7 patients with NETG3 and 0% in 5 patients with NECG3 (P<0.0001). Independent predictors of worse OS were age>60 y.o (P=0.014), synchronous metastasis (P=0.005) and WHO 2017 with significant differences between NETG1 versus NETG2 (P=0.005), NETG3 (P<0.001) and NECG3 (P<0.001). Independent predictors of worse DFS were symptomatic NET (P=0.038), pN+ status (P=0.027) and WHO 2017 with significant differences between NETG1 versus NETG3 (P=0.014) and NECG3 (P=0.009).The WHO 2017 grading system is a useful tool for patient prognosis after panNET resection and the tailoring of therapeutic strategy. Surgery could provide good results in NETG3 patients.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (113 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
souche2019outcomeclinics
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Souche, Regis;Coignac, Antoine;Dupuy, Marie;Bertrand, Martin;Raingeart, Isabelle;Guiu, Boris;Herrero, Astrid;Panaro, Fabrizio;Obled, Stephane;Portales, Fabienne;Riviere, Benjamin;Ramos, Jeanne;Borie, Frederic;Quenet, Francois;Colombo, Pierre-Emmanuel;Prudhomme, Michel;Assenat, Eric;Fabre, Jean-Michel;, ;, ; |
| Journal | clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
S2210-7401(19)30194-9
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.