Applying Qualification Directive - 2011/95/UE. CJEU’S Decision C-473/16
Clicks: 355
ID: 58488
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
64.8
/100
355 views
251 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #1 of 3 articles by views in bulletin of the transilvania university of braşov: series vii: social sciences, law
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Credibility of the asylum applicant’s assertions within any
member state of the European Union with regard to his or her possible persecution on grounds of sexual orientation, following return, is extremely important for the assessment of asylum admission. Nevertheless, in the case C-473/16, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) states that performing a psychological expertise for assessment of an applicant’ sexual orientation does not comply with the Directive, as concerns the Eu Charter of Fundamental Rights.
| Reference Key |
aldea2018applyingbulletin
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ALDEA, A.; |
| Journal | bulletin of the transilvania university of braşov: series vii: social sciences, law |
| Year | 2018 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.