Epidemic intelligence needs of stakeholders in the Asia-Pacific region.
Clicks: 395
ID: 58045
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Star Article
30.0
/100
395 views
42 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
StarRanked #1 of 2 articles by views in Western Pacific surveillance and response journal : WPSAR
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
To understand the global outbreak surveillance needs of stakeholders involved in epidemic response in selected countries and areas in the Asia-Pacific region to inform development of an epidemic observatory, Epi-watch.We designed an online, semi-structured stakeholder questionnaire to collect information on global outbreak surveillance sources and limitations from participants who use epidemic intelligence and outbreak alert services in their work in government and nongovernment organizations in the Asia-Pacific region.All respondents agreed that it was important to remain up to date with global outbreaks. The main reason cited for following global outbreak news was as an early warning for serious epidemics. Mainstream media and specialist Internet sources such as the World Health Organization ( = 54/91; 59%), the Program for Monitoring Emerging Diseases (ProMED)-mail ( = 45/91; 49%) and the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ( = 31/91; 34%) were the most common sources for global outbreak news; rapid intelligence services such as HealthMap were less common ( = 9/91; 10%). Only 51% ( = 46/91) of respondents thought that their sources of outbreak news were timely and sufficient for their needs.For those who work in epidemic response, epidemic intelligence is important and widely used. Stakeholders are less aware of and less frequently use rapid sources such as HealthMap and rely more on validated but less timely traditional sources of disease surveillance. Users identified a need for more timely and reliable epidemic intelligence.
| Reference Key |
hiiepidemicwestern
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Hii, Aurysia;Chughtai, Abrar Ahmad;Housen, Tambri;Saketa, Salanieta;Kunasekaran, Mohana Priya;Sulaiman, Feroza;Yanti, Nk Semara;MacIntyre, Chandini Raina; |
| Journal | Western Pacific surveillance and response journal : WPSAR |
| Year | Year not found |
| DOI |
10.5365/wpsar.2018.9.2.009
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.