Nutritional evaluation of hominy as poultry feed

Clicks: 362
ID: 57794
1998
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Star

Ranked #1 of 2 articles by views in jurnal ilmu ternak dan veteriner

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
A series of chemical, biological assay and growth trials were conducted to determine the nutritive value of hominy, relative to corn. The crude protein, ash, NDF and ADF content of hominy were 10.25%, 2.10%, 19.10% and 4.70% respectively, and are higher than the corn level, 8.5%, 0.40%, 2.30% and 1.90% respectively. While its crude fat (3.20%) and metabolize energy (3,020 kcal/kg) contents were lower than the corn level 4,40% and 330 kcal/kg. Seven hundred DOC broilers of commercial strain were used for growth trial for 42 days. The birds were divided into 5 treatments group with 4 replications (35 bird/replicate). Experimental rations, starter and finisher, were formulated with graded levels of hominy on the expense of corn (A = 0%, B = 33.3%, C = 50%, D= 66.6% and E = 100%) with similar level of crude protein and metabolize energy. Feed consumption was not affected (P>0.05) by the treatments, however body weight gain (BWG) and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were both significantly (P<0.05) affected by the treatments. Body weight gain of treatment A (1,712 g) was similar to treatment B (1,683 g) and C (1,682 g) but significantly (P<0.05) higher than treatment D (1,598 g) and E (1,570 g). Feed convertion ratio of treatment A (2.17) was similar to the treatment B (2.26) but significantly better (P<0.05) than treatment C (2.30), D (2.36) and E (2.39). Carcass quality was not affected by the treatments except for the shank color, where treatment A (7.38) was significantly yellower than the other treatments (B=2.50, C=2.75, D=1.75 and E=1.0). It is concluded that the protein content of hominy is higher than corn, but its metabolize energy was lower than the corn. Hominy could be included in the ration replacing corn up to 33.3% without affecting performance of the bird.
Reference Key
kompiang1998nutritionaljurnal Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Kompiang, I Putu;Supriyati, ;
Journal jurnal ilmu ternak dan veteriner
Year 1998
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.