The Effectiveness of a Risk Stratification Protocol for Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

Clicks: 381
ID: 57639
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #6 of 9 articles by views in the journal of arthroplasty

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This study's purpose was to present our institution's experience with the use of a risk stratification protocol for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in joint arthroplasty in which "routine" risk patients receive a mobile compression device in conjunction with aspirin and "high"-risk patients receive warfarin for thromboprophylaxis.This was a prospective study of patients undergoing primary or revision knee or hip arthroplasty. Exclusion criteria were patients with a current deep vein thrombosis, history of pulmonary embolism, chronic warfarin therapy, planned multiple surgeries, and prolonged postoperative immobilization. Patients were stratified as either routine or high risk. Routine risk patients received mobile compression devices for 10 days and aspirin twice daily for 6 weeks, whereas high-risk patients received warfarin for 4 weeks and compression stockings for 6 weeks.A total of 3143 total joint arthroplasties were enrolled (2222, 70.7% "routine"; 921, 29.3% "high risk"). The rate of symptomatic VTE within 6 weeks postoperatively was 0.7% (95% CI 0.3%-1.0%) in the standard vs 0.5% (95% CI 0.01%-1.0%) in the high-risk cohort (P = .67), and within 6 months postoperatively was 0.6% (95% CI 0.3%-1.0%) in the standard vs 1.1% (95% CI 0.4%-1.8%) in the high-risk cohort (P = .23). The rate of major bleeding events was significantly lower in the routine (0.4%; 95% CI 0.1%-0.6%) vs high-risk (2.0%; 95% CI 1.0%-3.0%; P < .001) cohort.This study demonstrates that use of a risk stratification protocol allowed the avoidance of more aggressive anticoagulation in 70% of patients while achieving a low overall incidence of symptomatic VTE.
Reference Key
nam2016thethe Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Nam, Denis;Nunley, Ryan M;Johnson, Staci R;Keeney, James A;Clohisy, John C;Barrack, Robert L;
Journal the journal of arthroplasty
Year 2016
DOI
S0883-5403(15)01084-0
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.