Evaluation of AAA and XVMC Algorithms for Dose Calculation in Lung Equivalent Heterogeneity in Photon Fields: A Comparison of Calculated Results with Measurements

Clicks: 357
ID: 57336
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Star

Ranked #3 of 3 articles by views in journal of biomedical physics and engineering

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Aims: The aims of the present work are (1) to evaluate dose calculation accuracy of two commonly used algorithms for 15 MV small photon fields in a medium encompassing heterogeneity and (2) to compare them with measured results obtained from gafchromic film EBT2. Materials and Methods: Authors employed kailwood (Pinus Wallichiana) to mimic lung. Briefly, seven Kailwood plates, each measuring 25x25 cm2 of varying thicknesses totaling 13 cm equivalent to the mean thickness of an adult human lung, were sandwiched between 5 cm tissue equivalent material from top and 10 cm below. Physical measurements were performed using Radiochromic film EBT2. The field sizes of 1x1, 2x2, 5x5 and 10x10 cm2 were selected at 100 cm SSD. Simulations were performed using EGSnrc/DOSRZnrc Monte Carlo code. The dose variation inside the inhomogeneity and near the interface was calculated using AAA & XVMC algorithm. Results: Preliminary results show that there is large variation of dose inside inhomogeneity. The maximum variation of dose inside the inhomogeneity for 1x1 cm2 was found 40% by AAA and 4.5% by XVMC compared to measured/simulated results. For the field size of 2x2 cm2, these figures were 27% by AAA & 3.5% by XVMC. For 5x5 cm2 field size, the variation is small which becomes insignificant for larger fields. Conclusion: The results presented in this work indicate that for smaller fields, XVMC algorithm gives more realistic prediction, while there is the need for caution on using AAA algorithm for dose calculations involving small area irradiation encompassing heterogeneities and low-density media.
Reference Key
n2018evaluationjournal Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors N., Singh;K., Painuly N.;N., Chaudhari L.;A., Chairmadurai;T., Verma;D., Shrotiya;C.P., Bhatt;
Journal journal of biomedical physics and engineering
Year 2018
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.