[Present situation and prospect of diagnosis and treatment of periprosthetic joint infections].

Clicks: 322
ID: 57202
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Star

Ranked #5 of 9 articles by views in zhonghua wai ke za zhi [chinese journal of surgery]

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) as an insurmountable challenge has always represented a serious concern for orthopedic surgeons. Accurate diagnosis and reasonable treatment of PJI are the keys to deal with this challenge.The diagnosis of PJI is mainly based on clinical manifestations, joint fluid biochemistry, pathogen culture and biomarkers at present. New pathogen culture methods and specific biomarkers in recent years are hot topics in PJI research. In terms of treatment, two-stage revision is still considered to be the 'gold standard' protocol. However, more and more centers around the world have begun to accept and try one-stage revision as a treatment for PJI.
Reference Key
cao2019presentzhonghua Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Cao, L;
Journal zhonghua wai ke za zhi [chinese journal of surgery]
Year 2019
DOI
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2019.05.001
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.