A multi-arm cluster randomized clinical trial of the use of knee kinesiography in the management of osteoarthritis patients in a primary care setting.
Clicks: 404
ID: 56537
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
78.5
/100
404 views
267 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #1 of 3 articles by views in postgraduate medicine
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
: An important clinical gap reported by primary care physicians (PCPs) in managing knee osteoarthritis patients is the lack of validated tools to help them guide conservative treatment decision-making. This study aimed at evaluating the clinical utility of adding to current medical management (CMM) by PCPs, a dynamic knee kinesiography (KneeKG) exam assessing biomechanical risk factors linked to osteoarthritis progression. : In this 6-month cluster randomized controlled trial, primary care clinics were randomized into three groups: 1-CMM by PCPs, 2-CMM+KneeKG, and 3-CMM+KneeKG+Education (a self-management education session and two follow-up group meetings). Primary outcomes were scores on the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales and overall score. : Of the 894 patients referred from 87 clinics, 515 participated, 449 (87.2%) completed the study. At 6-month follow-up, patients in both KneeKG groups reported statistically significant improvement on the KOOS overall score (Group2: +5.5; Group3: +5.0), and on the symptoms, pain, and activities of daily living subscales compared to control group (all p < 0.05). They also reported significantly higher satisfaction levels with global care (both p < 0.01). Group 3-CMM+KneeKG+Education showed statistically significant improvements in objective functional tests as well as greater global impression of change in pain, function, quality of life, and global condition (all p < 0.05). : Results demonstrated significant improvements in terms of pain, function, and satisfaction in KneeKG groups relative to the CMM. Adding education and supervision further improves clinical outcomes. These findings may support the added value of a KneeKG exam in assisting PCPs in the management of knee osteoarthritis patients.
| Reference Key |
cagnin2019apostgraduate
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Cagnin, Alix;Choinière, Manon;Bureau, Nathalie J;Durand, Madeleine;Mezghani, Neila;Gaudreault, Nathaly;Hagemeister, Nicola; |
| Journal | postgraduate medicine |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1080/00325481.2019.1665457
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.