A Global Review of Animal-Visitor Interactions in Modern Zoos and Aquariums and Their Implications for Wild Animal Welfare.

Clicks: 414
ID: 55717
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #12 of 100 articles by views in animals

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
We provide an initial insight into the occurrence and characteristics of animal-visitor interactions (AVIs) involving captive wild animals within zoos and aquaria. Using information provided online via official public websites of modern zoos and aquaria, we found that AVIs were provided by the majority of facilities. Our study revealed that a variety of AVI types were being offered. Globally, petting captive wild animals was the most prevalent AVI type advertised ( = 1241 observations, 43% (534) of facilities) and Mammalia was the most advertised taxonomic class ( = 5142; 53% (2739)). We found certain AVI types that were more commonly offered than predicted. These were opportunities to: (1) Hand feed captive wild animals in Asia, North America and Oceania; (2) ride wild animals in Europe and North America; (3) walk with or swim through wild animal enclosures in Asia; and (4) walk with wild animals in Asia and Europe. Given the global prevalence of AVIs in modern zoos and aquaria, and an apparent lack of animal welfare focused research, we provide recommendations to help effectively balance and manage captive wild animal welfare with other primary interconnected goals.
Reference Key
dcruze2019aanimals Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors D'Cruze, Neil;Khan, Sophie;Carder, Gemma;Megson, David;Coulthard, Emma;Norrey, John;Groves, Georgina;
Journal animals
Year 2019
DOI
E332
URL
Keywords
Education Tourism conservation word association for zoo and aquariums wildlife ELISA flow cytometry multiplate® p2y12 inhibitors vasp. multi-center studies systematic review mental health services planning bayesian networks mental health systems structural equation modelling causal model mental health care, management policy-making

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.