PR Prolongation predicts inadequate resynchronization with biventricular pacing in left bundle branch block.
Clicks: 344
ID: 55640
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
71.2
/100
344 views
225 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #6 of 17 articles by views in pacing and clinical electrophysiology : pace
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
PR interval prolongation is associated with poor outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) among patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) but the mechanisms are unknown. We investigated clinical outcomes, electrocardiogram (ECG), and echocardiogram changes after CRT by PR interval.This is a retrospective study of CRT recipients with a baseline ejection fraction ≤35% and ECG showing sinus rhythm and LBBB. Patients were stratified by baseline PR interval quartile and the primary combined endpoint was time to heart transplantation, left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, or death. ECG, echocardiogram, and clinical variables were compared to identify mechanisms for observed differences in outcomes.Of 291 eligible patients, the mean age was 65 years, 60% were male, and 19% had prior atrial fibrillation. Patients with PR prolongation (quartile 4, PR > 200 ms) more frequently had a history of atrial fibrillation, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, prior implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation, and use of amiodarone than patients in PR quartiles 1-3. A PR > 200ms was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.7 (95% CI: 1.1-2.5) for the primary endpoint. Patients with PR > 200 ms had less reduction in QRS duration and QRS area after CRT while having more increase in QT and QTc intervals than patients with PR ≤ 200 ms. No major differences were observed in echocardiography by baseline PR interval quartiles.PR prolongation predicts shorter survival free of heart transplantation or LVAD implantation in patients with LBBB. This may be due to inadequate ventricular resynchronization.
| Reference Key |
atwater2019prpacing
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Atwater, Brett D;Emerek, Kasper;Sørensen, Peter L;Hansen, Steen M;Loring, Zak;Graff, Claus;Polcwiartek, Christoffer;Kisslo, Joseph;Søgaard, Peter;Friedman, Daniel J; |
| Journal | pacing and clinical electrophysiology : pace |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1111/pace.13802
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.