Make Intelligent of Gastric Cancer Diagnosis Error in Qazvin's Medical Centers: Using Data Mining Method.
Clicks: 595
ID: 55610
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
68.8
/100
595 views
417 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #1 of 15 articles by views in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Objective: Gastric cancer is one of the most common types of cancers, which will result in irreparable harm in
the case of misdiagnosis or late diagnosis. The purpose of this study is to investigate the capability of data mining
techniques and disease risk factor characteristics to predict and diagnose the gastric cancer. Methods: In this retrospective
descriptive-analytic study, we selected 405 samples from two groups of patient and healthy participants. A total of 11
characteristics and risk factors were examined. we used four Machine learning methods, Include support vector machine
(SVM), decision tree (DT), naive Bayesian model, and k nearest neighborhood (KNN) to classify the patients with
gastric cancer. The evaluation criteria to investigate the model on the database of patients with gastric cancer included
Recall, Precision, F-score, and Accuracy. Data was analyzed using MATLAB® software, version 3.2 (Mathworks Inc.,
Natick, MA, USA). Results: Based on the results achieved from the evaluation of four methods, the accuracy rates
of SVM, DT, naive Bayesian model, and KNN algorithms were 90.08, 87.89, 87.60, and 87.60 percent, respectively.
The findings showed that the highest level of F-Score was related to the SVM (91.99); whereas, the lowest rate was
associated with the KNN algorithm (87.17). Conclusion: According to the findings, the SVM algorithm showed the
best results in classification of Test samples. So, this intelligent system can be used as a physician assistant in medical
education hospitals, where the diagnosis processes are performed by medical students.
| Reference Key |
mortezagholi2019makeasian
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Mortezagholi, Asghar;Khosravizadeh, Omid;Menhaj, Mohammad Bagher;Shafigh, Younes;Kalhor, Rohollah; |
| Journal | Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
88754
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.