CLASSIFICATION OF GALAXIES IN SHAPLEY CONCENTRATION REGION WITH MACHINE LEARNING
Clicks: 258
ID: 5520
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
67.1
/100
258 views
180 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #36 of 68 articles by views in mugla journal of science and technology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The galaxies, are the systems consisting of stars, gas, dust and dark matter combined with the gravitational force. There are billions of galaxies in the universe. Since the cost of examining each galaxy one by one is high, the classification of the galaxy is an important part of the astronomical data analysis. Galaxies are classified according to morphology and spectral properties. Machine learning methods aimed at revealing the hidden pattern within the data set by analyzing the available data, it can be used to estimate which group of galaxies whose natural groups have not yet been identified. This will save time and cost for both researchers and astronomers. This study has been classified five-variables (Right ascension, Declination, Magnitude, Velocity, and Sigma of Velocity) 4215 galaxies. Galaxies whose natural groups were determined with IDL were classified by using machine learning algorithms with Weka program. Bayes classifier methods, Naive Bayes and Bayes net, Decision tree methods J48, LMT and Random Forest algorithms, Artificial Neural Networks Multilayer Perceptron and Support vector classifier methods were used. The obtained classification results were compared with the natural groups and the predictive performance of the methods were evaluated.
| Reference Key |
nazl2019classificationmugla
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Nazlı Deniz Ergüç;Nida Gökçe Narin and |
| Journal | mugla journal of science and technology |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | URL not found |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.