Improvement of Surface Roughness and Hydrophobicity in PETG Parts Manufactured via Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM): An Application in 3D Printed Self-Cleaning Parts.
Clicks: 341
ID: 54161
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
65.9
/100
341 views
228 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #122 of 812 articles by views in Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 812 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The fused deposition modeling (FDM) technique is used today by companies engaged in the fabrication of traffic signs for the manufacture of light-emitting diode LED spotlights. In this sector, the surface properties of the elements used (surface finish, hydrophobic features) are decisive because surfaces that retain little dirt and favor self-cleaning behavior are needed. A design of experiments (L27) with five factors and three levels has been carried out. The factors studied were: Layer height (LH), print temperature (T), print speed (PS), print acceleration (PA), and flow rate (F). Polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG) specimens of 25.0 × 25.0 × 2.4 mm have been printed and, in each of them, the surface roughness (, ), sliding angle (SA, SA), and contact angle (CA, CA) in both perpendicular directions have been measured. Taguchi and ANOVA analysis shows that the most influential variables in this case are printing acceleration for (-value = 0.052) and for SA (-value = 0.051) and flow rate for (-value = 0.001) and for SA (-value = 0.012). Although the ANOVA results for the contact angle are not significant, specimen 8 (PA = 1500 mm/s and flow rate F = 110%) and specimen 10 (PA =1500 mm/s and F = 100%) have reached contact angle values above or near the limit value for hydrophobia, respectively.
| Reference Key |
barrios2019improvementmaterials
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Barrios, Juan M;Romero, Pablo E; |
| Journal | Materials (Basel, Switzerland) |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
E2499
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.