Social communication following traumatic brain injury part I: State-of-the-art review of assessment tools.

Clicks: 300
ID: 54009
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
The primary aim of this paper was to identify and describe current social communication assessment tools for adults with traumatic brain injury.We conducted a state-of-the-art review to identify and categorise the range of social communication assessment tools found in the assessment and treatment literature that revealed 42 measures that were coded according to characteristics related to assessment types, psychometrics, and implementation.Of the 42 assessments, 64% evaluated social cognition and the remaining 36% evaluated communication. Coding of implementation categories revealed that only 18/42 (43%) measures were ecologically grounded and 23/42 (55%) were available to clinicians by purchase or in the public domain. Only three measures incorporated questions or an assessment of the examinee's priorities or concerns.A number of factors limit current social communication assessment. The lack of tools that objectively and reliably evaluate communication or social cognition in ecologically valid ways remains problematic. Of particular concern is the lack of prioritisation of the individual's communication values and needs. Recommendations include a call to focus research on the development of more contextual, standardised assessments, consider availability and feasibility when tools are being developed, and evaluate assessment processes as well as discrete tools.
Reference Key
sohlberg2019socialinternational Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Sohlberg, McKay Moore;MacDonald, Sheila;Byom, Lindsey;Iwashita, Heidi;Lemoncello, Rik;Meulenbroek, Peter;Ness, Bryan;O'Neil-Pirozzi, Therese M;
Journal international journal of speech-language pathology
Year 2019
DOI
10.1080/17549507.2019.1583280
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.