Esophageal position, measured luminal temperatures, and risk of atrioesophageal fistula with atrial fibrillation ablation.
Clicks: 308
ID: 53709
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
308 views
40 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #8 of 17 articles by views in pacing and clinical electrophysiology : pace
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Despite improvement in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), ability to recognize and prevent esophageal injury remains challenging. We hypothesized that esophageal course may impact esophageal heating, as measured through ablation, and thereby, risk of injury.We evaluated all patients undergoing first-time AF ablation with preprocedural computed tomography (CT) imaging from 2014 to 2016 at our institution, focusing on esophageal position at the left atrial (LA)/pulmonary vein junction. Esophageal luminal temperatures (ELTs) were analyzed by esophageal course. In exploratory work by investigation of published reports of atrioesophageal fistula (AEF), we evaluated for a relationship between esophageal course and risk of AEF.Of 68 patients, 48.5% had midline, 36.8% leftward, and 14.7% rightward esophageal positions. Of 20 patients (29% of cohort) with esophageal confinement-defined as a midline or leftward position relative to the LA, vertebrae, and aorta, with luminal distortion-14 had leftward position. No significant differences in patient or procedure characteristics were noted between confinement and nonconfinement cohorts. The average peak ELT was significantly higher in those with confinement (36.9°C vs 36.2°C, P < 0.05) and confinement with a left-sided esophagus (37.1°C vs 36.2°C, P < 0.05). There was a significant correlation between esophageal confinement and risk of AEF (odds ratio [OR]: 2.7, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-6.2, P < 0.01).Approximately one-third of patients undergoing AF ablation display leftward esophageal course along the ablation zone on preprocedure CT imaging, with a significant portion exhibiting esophageal confinement. In those with confinement, higher peak ELTs are noted with ablation. Esophageal confinement may be a risk factor for development of AEF.
| Reference Key |
sandhu2019esophagealpacing
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Sandhu, Amneet;Zipse, Matthew M;Borne, Ryan T;Aleong, Ryan G;Tompkins, Christine;Schuller, Joseph;Rosenberg, Michael;Varosy, Paul D;Tzou, Wendy S;Nguyen, Duy T;Sauer, William H; |
| Journal | pacing and clinical electrophysiology : pace |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1111/pace.13639
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.