Does Insurance Status Impact Delivery of Care with Upper Airway Stimulation for OSA?

Clicks: 402
ID: 52100
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #3 of 6 articles by views in the annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
To understand differences in patient demographics, insurance-related treatment delays, and average waiting times for Medicare and private insurance patients undergoing upper airway stimulation (UAS) for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).Retrospective chart review of all Medicare and private insurance patients undergoing upper airway stimulation (UAS) from 2015 to 2018 at a single academic center. Primary outcomes were insurance-related procedure cancellation rate and time from drug induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) and UAS treatment recommendation to UAS surgery in Medicare versus private insurance patients.In our cohort 207 underwent DISE and were recommended treatment with UAS. Forty-four patients with Medicare and 30 patients with private insurance underwent UAS procedure. Patients with Medicare undergoing UAS were older (67.4 ± 11.1 years) than patients with private insurance (54.9 ± 8.1 years). Medicare patients had a shorter mean wait time of 121.9 ± 75.8 days (range, 15-331 days) from the time of UAS treatment recommendation to UAS surgery when compared to patients with private insurance (201.3 ± 102.2 days; range, 33-477 days). Three patients with Medicare (6.4%) and 8 patients with private insurance (21.1%) were ultimately denied UAS.Medicare patients undergoing UAS have shorter waiting periods, fewer insurance-related treatment delays and may experience fewer procedure cancellations when compared to patients with private insurance. The investigational status of UAS by private insurance companies delays care for patients with OSA.4.
Reference Key
patel2019doesthe Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Patel, Jena;Topf, Michael C;Huntley, Colin;Boon, Maurits;
Journal the annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology
Year 2019
DOI
10.1177/0003489419878454
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.