Coercion, dissatisfaction, and social stigma: an ethnographic study of compensated living kidney donation in Iran.

Clicks: 521
ID: 51255
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #1 of 71 articles by views in International urology and nephrology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
This article updates the qualitative research on Iran reported in the 2012 article by Tong et al. "The experiences of commercial kidney donors: thematic synthesis of qualitative research" (Tong et al. in Transpl Int 25:1138-1149, 2012). The basic approach used in the Tong et al. article is applied to a more recent and more comprehensive study of Iranian living organ donors, providing a clearer picture of what compensated organ donation is like in Iran since the national government began regulating compensated donation. Iran is the only country in the world where kidney selling is legal, regulated, and subsidized by the national government. This article focuses on three themes: (1) coercion and other pressures to donate, (2) donor satisfaction with their donation experience, and (3) whether donors fear social stigma. We found no evidence of coercion, but 68% of the paid living organ donors interviewed felt pressure to donate due to extreme poverty or other family pressures. Even though 27% of the living kidney donors interviewed said they were satisfied with their donation experience, 74% had complaints about the donation process or its results, including some of the donors who said they were satisfied. In addition, 84% of donors indicated they feared experiencing social stigma because of their kidney donation.
Reference Key
fryrevere2018coercioninternational Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Fry-Revere, Sigrid;Chen, Deborah;Bastani, Bahar;Golestani, Simin;Agarwal, Rachana;Kugathasan, Howsikan;Le, Melissa;
Journal International urology and nephrology
Year 2018
DOI
10.1007/s11255-018-1824-y
URL
Keywords
Iran Social justice transplantation law poverty human rights ethics bioethics medical ethics donor satisfaction ethnographic study exploitation living kidney donation living organ donation paid organ donation transplant ethics

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.