Three brief pieces of statistical advice for medical peer reviewers.
Clicks: 282
ID: 50875
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
77.7
/100
275 views
222 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
The scientific peer review of medical research papers often entails the assessment of statistical results. Medical reviewers may sometimes feel overburdened by a task for which they are usually not specifically trained for. We offer three pieces of non-technical statistical advice.
| Reference Key |
heinzl2019threeeuropean
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Heinzl, Harald;Benner, Axel; |
| Journal | european journal of clinical investigation |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1111/eci.13171
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.