Raskid ugovora - frustacija ugovora : [prikaz presude]

Clicks: 305
ID: 50230
1990
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Star

Ranked #3 of 3 articles by views in uporedno pomorsko pravo

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Rizici ili opasnost ili nesreće na moru - kao uzroci koji su predviđeni u klauzuli ugovora koja daje pravo na raskid ugovora -, trebaju biti shvaćeni uz kvalifikaciju ''ako nisu uzrokovani nemarom stranke'' koja je dužna izvršiti obvezu preuzetu ugovorom. Gubitak jednog od dva prijevozna sredstva, kojima je ugovoreno izvršenje ugovora o prijevozu stvari morem, ne znači frustraciju ugovora, pa čak ako je do gubitka došlo bez nemarnosti ugovorne strane koja je prema ugovoru dužna izvršiti prijevoz.
Reference Key
oric1990raskiduporedno Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Ćorić, Dorotea;
Journal uporedno pomorsko pravo
Year 1990
DOI
DOI not found
URL
https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/314089
Keywords
transportation engineering law shipment of goods. delivery of goods

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.