GUIDELINES TO RISK MANAGEMENT MATURITY IN CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS

Clicks: 819
ID: 50169
2016
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #1 of 6 articles by views in brazilian journal of operations & production management

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Purpose – This article aims to provide the guidelines to assess the risk management maturity (RMM) of construction projects. Design/methodology/approach – This article presents a literature review of the main risk management models, which aims to support a survey research to define, according to experts, the market preference and knowledge of RMM models. Findings – We pointed out in this article a set of guidelines to direct the maturity analysis of RM in the Construction Industry and proposed a model matrix to help companies to evaluate the maturity of the RM of a whole project or each activity separately. Research limitations/Implications – Limitations of this article include the search options originally defined by the researches in literature review and concepts and measures chosen to be evaluated by experts in the survey. Other approaches could explore the implementation of a RMM model considering quantitative measures in others areas. Practical Implications – The article provide to construction companies a way to measure their risk management capacity against four standard levels of maturity, allowing them to make benchmarking and to improve and increase their ability to manage risk. Originality/value – We highlighted to professionals and academics what factors were essential seeking to improve the risk management continuously.
Reference Key
caiado2016guidelinesbrazilian Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Caiado, Rodrigo Goyannes Gusmão;Lima, Gilson Brito Alves;Nascimento, Daniel Luiz de Mattos;Neto, Julio Vieira;Oliveira, Rodolpho Augusto Maultasch de ;
Journal brazilian journal of operations & production management
Year 2016
DOI
DOI not found
URL
https://bjopm.emnuvens.com.br/bjopm/article/view/326
Keywords
Information technology public aspects of medicine management. industrial management sociology (general) economic growth, development, planning ethnology. social and cultural anthropology diseases of the digestive system. gastroenterology information theory organizational behaviour, change and effectiveness. corporate culture production management. operations management

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.