Exercise Interventions in Huntington's Disease: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.
Clicks: 374
ID: 49408
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Star Article
30.0
/100
374 views
39 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
StarRanked #1 of 2 articles by views in movement disorders clinical practice
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Physical activity may be beneficial in Huntington's disease (HD); however, studies to date have been underpowered to detect change. We combined data from five randomized controlled feasibility trials using individual patient data meta-analyses.All trial interventions comprised a combination of supervised and self-directed physical activity, with varied emphasis on aerobic, strength, endurance, flexibility, and task training. Duration ranged from 8 to 16 weeks. The primary outcome was the modified Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Motor Score. Secondary outcomes included the Symbol Digit Modality Test, Berg Balance Scale, 30-second Chair stand, Timed Up and Go, Gait Speed, Physical Performance Test, Six-Minute Walk, International Physical Activity Questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, EuroQol Health Utility Index, and Short-Form 36 Health Related Quality of Life Scale. The primary analysis utilized a two-stage approach. A one-stage approach was explored as a sensitivity analysis using a cross-classified (by study site) linear mixed-effects model.One hundred twenty-one participants provided complete data. Risk of bias was moderate; however, primary outcomes were blind assessed. Primary pooled effect estimates adjusted for baseline modified motor score (95% confidence interval) were 0.2 (-2.1 to 2.6) favoring control. There was considerable heterogeneity between the studies.There was no evidence of an exercise effect on the modified motor score in these relatively short-duration interventions. Longer-duration trials incorporating supervised components meeting frequency, intensity, time, and type principles are required. Lack of common outcomes limited the analysis and highlight the importance of a core outcome set for evaluating exercise in HD.
| Reference Key |
playle2019exercisemovement
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Playle, Rebecca;Dimitropoulou, Polyxeni;Kelson, Mark;Quinn, Lori;Busse, Monica; |
| Journal | movement disorders clinical practice |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1002/mdc3.12809
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.