Qualitative Methodology in Cardiovascular Outcomes Research: A Contemporary Look.
Clicks: 324
ID: 48527
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Star Article
82.2
/100
320 views
259 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Qualitative research offers unique opportunities to contribute to cardiovascular outcomes research. Despite the growth in qualitative research over the last decade, outcomes investigators in cardiology still have relatively little guidance on when and how best to implement these methods in their investigations, leaving the full potential of these methods unrealized. We offer a contemporary look at qualitative methods, including publication trends of qualitative studies in cardiology journals from 1998 to 2018, novel emerging data collection and analytic methods, and current use and examples of cardiovascular outcomes research that apply qualitative methods such as user-centered design, preimplementation evaluation, implementation evaluation, effectiveness evaluation, and policy analysis.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (102 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
mcilvennan2019qualitativecirculation
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | McIlvennan, Colleen K;Morris, Megan A;Guetterman, Timothy C;Matlock, Daniel D;Curry, Leslie; |
| Journal | circulation cardiovascular quality and outcomes |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.005828
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.