Comparison of confidence procedures for type I censored exponential lifetimes.

Clicks: 371
ID: 47852
2001
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
In the model of type I censored exponential lifetimes, coverage probabilities are compared for a number of confidence interval constructions proposed in literature. The coverage probabilities are calculated exactly for sample sizes up to 50 and for different degrees of censoring and different degrees of intended confidence. If not only a fair two-sided coverage is desired, but also fair one-sided coverages, only few methods are quite satisfactory. A likelihood-based interval and a third root transformation to normality work almost perfectly, but the chi 2-based method that is perfect under no censoring and under type II censoring can also be advocated.
Reference Key
sundberg2001comparisonlifetime Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Sundberg, R;
Journal lifetime data analysis
Year 2001
DOI
DOI not found
URL URL not found
Keywords
Ecology conservation birds cafés ecophylogenetics feeding associations foraging associations landscapes restaurants rural environments urban environments

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.