Ecological and cultural factors underlying the global distribution of prejudice.

Clicks: 353
ID: 47481
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #503 of 2,056 articles by views in PloS one

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 2,056 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Prejudiced attitudes and political nationalism vary widely around the world, but there has been little research on what predicts this variation. Here we examine the ecological and cultural factors underlying the worldwide distribution of prejudice. We suggest that cultures grow more prejudiced when they tighten cultural norms in response to destabilizing ecological threats. A set of seven archival analyses, surveys, and experiments (∑N = 3,986,402) find that nations, American states, and pre-industrial societies with tighter cultural norms show the most prejudice based on skin color, religion, nationality, and sexuality, and that tightness predicts why prejudice is often highest in areas of the world with histories of ecological threat. People's support for cultural tightness also mediates the link between perceived ecological threat and intentions to vote for nationalist politicians. Results replicate when controlling for economic development, inequality, conservatism, residential mobility, and shared cultural heritage. These findings offer a cultural evolutionary perspective on prejudice, with implications for immigration, intercultural conflict, and radicalization.
Reference Key
jackson2019ecologicalplos Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Jackson, Joshua Conrad;van Egmond, Marieke;Choi, Virginia K;Ember, Carol R;Halberstadt, Jamin;Balanovic, Jovana;Basker, Inger N;Boehnke, Klaus;Buki, Noemi;Fischer, Ronald;Fulop, Marta;Fulmer, Ashley;Homan, Astrid C;van Kleef, Gerben A;Kreemers, Loes;Schei, Vidar;Szabo, Erna;Ward, Colleen;Gelfand, Michele J;
Journal PloS one
Year 2019
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0221953
URL
Keywords
policy qualitative methods social inclusion minority age-friendly city diversity and ethnicity long-term services and support

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.