A Scoping Review of Validated Tools to Measure Incivility in Healthcare Settings.
Clicks: 347
ID: 46935
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Star Article
80.2
/100
340 views
273 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
To identify and compare validated tools used to assess incivility in healthcare settings.Incivility in the workforce is associated with poor quality outcomes, increased employee turnover, and decreased job satisfaction. Validated tools are essential for accurate measurement of incivility. The aim of this study was to compare characteristics of validated tools for use in a busy clinical setting.In a scoping review, English language research studies using incivility tools published in PubMed or CINAHL between March 1, 2013, and March 14, 2018, were assessed for sound psychometric properties and feasibility of use (eg, short, easy to administer).After screening 869 articles and full text review of 244, 5 identified tools met the criteria; the Short Negative Acts Questionnaire seemed best suited for use in a busy healthcare setting.Adoption of a standardized and validated incivility tool makes it possible to compare across clinical settings and track progress over time.
| Reference Key |
harris2019athe
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Harris, Whitney C;Usseglio, John;Chapman-Rodriguez, Rose;Licursi, Maureen;Larson, Elaine; |
| Journal | the journal of nursing administration |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1097/NNA.0000000000000783
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.