Grammatical Structures in Cross-Cultural Comparisons
Clicks: 433
ID: 46795
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Star Article
72.1
/100
433 views
308 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
StarRanked #1 of 5 articles by views in russian journal of linguistics
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The article discusses how cultural information is embedded at the level of grammar and it treats grammar as inseparable from semantics and pragmatics. The study is done within the approach known as ethnosyntax. The article provides examples of cultural meaning embedded at the level of syntax relying on examples from Russian and English. In particular, it demonstrates variation in impersonal constructions in Russian and causative constructions in English. It then discusses variation in the use of grammatical structures due to the influence of cultural factors on the basis of ways of wording ‘requests’ in English and Russian. The linguistic examples in the discussion are sources from the Russian National Corpus for Russian and Collins Wordbanks Online for English. The article argues for the importance of culture-sensitive linguistic studies in language teaching.
| Reference Key |
gladkova2015grammatical
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Gladkova, Anna N; |
| Journal | russian journal of linguistics |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar
history of scholarship and learning. the humanities
social sciences (general)
social sciences
philology. linguistics
history (general) and history of europe
language and literature
special aspects of education
indo-iranian languages and literature
computational linguistics. natural language processing
|
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.