What Does the Chinese Public Care About with Regard to Primary Care Physicians: Trustworthiness or Competence?

Clicks: 264
ID: 46052
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #22 of 64 articles by views in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
and China has launched a series of reforms to enhance primary care. The aims of these reforms are to strengthen the functionality of primary care to encourage patients to use primary care. Patients' trust in physicians is important in clinical medicine; however, little is known about how Chinese patients' preferences relate to their trust in primary care physicians. This study's objectives are to measure the Chinese public's trust in primary care physicians and to characterize reasons of their preferences for health care. This quantitative study comprises a face-to-face survey with a convenience sample ( = 273) of people visiting community health centers or stations (CHCSs) in Wuhan, China. We measured the patients' preferences for the different level of hospitals and their trust in physicians, as well as the reasons of the patients' preferences, using a Chinese version of the Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale and other variables (such as demographics, health status, and hospital preference). Approximately two thirds (68.6%) of the participants had experienced a mild or chronic disease in the year before the survey, but only 26.4% preferred to visit CHCSs in such cases. The negative factors related to this lack of preference are the physicians' competence (odds ratio [OR] = 0.250), the medical equipment (OR = 0.301), and the popularity of hospitals (OR = 0.172). The positive factors were ease of access (OR = 2.218) and affordability (OR = 1.900). The participants expressed a moderate trust in physicians in CHCSs (score of 3.02 out of 5). There is no association between the patients' trust and their hospital preference ( = 0.019, p = 0.859). Of the participants, 92 suggested that the physicians in CHCSs should improve in terms of their competence ( = 53), attitude ( = 35), and/or medical ethics ( = 16). This study's results suggest that patients consider improving physicians' competence to be more important and urgent than improving those physicians' trustworthiness in terms of reconstructing Chinese primary care. Improving the physicians' competence would not only reduce the barriers that patients experience regarding CHCSs, but would also increase their trust in the physicians.
Reference Key
zhu2019whatmedicina Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Zhu, Egui;Cao, Yang;
Journal Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)
Year 2019
DOI
E455
URL
Keywords
primary care hospital preference public trust

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.