Effect of Baseline Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction on 2-Year Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Analysis of the PARTNER 2 Trials.

Clicks: 396
ID: 45771
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Star

Ranked #2 of 4 articles by views in circulation heart failure

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Impaired left ventricular function is associated with worse prognosis among patients with aortic stenosis treated medically or with surgical aortic valve replacement. It is unclear whether reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.Patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the PARTNER 2 trials (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) and registries were stratified according to presence of reduced LVEF (<50%) at baseline, and 2-year risk of cardiovascular mortality was compared using Kaplan-Meier methods and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. Of 2991 patients, 839 (28%) had reduced LVEF. These patients were younger, more often males, and were more likely to have comorbidities, such as coronary disease, diabetes mellitus, and renal insufficiency. Compared with patients with normal LVEF, patients with low LVEF had higher crude rates of 2-year cardiovascular mortality (19.8% versus 12.0%, <0.0001) and all-cause mortality (27.4% versus 19.2%, <0.0001). Mean aortic valve gradient was not associated with clinical outcomes other than heart failure hospitalizations (hazard ratio [HR], 0.99; CI, 0.99-1.00; =0.03). After multivariable adjustment, patients with reduced versus normal LVEF had significantly higher adjusted risk of cardiovascular death (adjusted HR, 1.42, 95% CI, 1.11-1.81; =0.005), but not all-cause death (adjusted HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.99-1.47; =0.07). When LVEF was treated as continuous variable, it was associated with increased 2-year risk of both cardiovascular mortality (adjusted HR per 10% decrease in LVEF, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.07-1.27; =0.0006) and all-cause mortality (adjusted HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01-1.16; =0.02).In this patient-level pooled analysis of PARTNER 2 patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement, baseline LVEF was an independent predictor of 2-year cardiovascular mortality.URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT01314313, NCT02184442, NCT03222128, and NCT02184441.
Reference Key
furer2019effectcirculation Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Furer, Ariel;Chen, Shmuel;Redfors, Bjorn;Elmariah, Sammy;Pibarot, Philippe;Herrmann, Howard C;Hahn, Rebecca T;Kodali, Susheel;Thourani, Vinod H;Douglas, Pamela S;Alu, Maria C;Fearon, William F;Passeri, Jonathan;Malaisrie, S Chris;Crowley, Aaron;McAndrew, Thomas;Genereux, Philippe;Ben-Yehuda, Ori;Leon, Martin B;Burkhoff, Daniel;
Journal circulation heart failure
Year 2019
DOI
10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.118.005809
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.