An approach to the writing of a scientific manuscript.
Clicks: 138
ID: 45514
2005
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
138 views
11 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #35 of 37 articles by views in The Journal of surgical research
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Writing a scientific manuscript is one of the most important tasks facing the academician, and may also be one of the most daunting.The essentials of any paper include a description of what is known, an assessment of what is unknown, a clear statement regarding the question and hypothesis being addressed by the current study, and a discussion and summary of new information that has been learned as a result of the study.A formulaic approach is provided to guide the author through this process.
| Reference Key |
cetin2005anthe
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Cetin, Selma;Hackam, David J; |
| Journal | The Journal of surgical research |
| Year | 2005 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | URL not found |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.