The safety and benefit of using oxidized regenerated cellulose to position free flap pedicle in head and neck reconstruction.
Clicks: 359
ID: 45331
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
76.9
/100
359 views
243 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #1 of 4 articles by views in microsurgery
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC; Surgicel®; Ethicon, Neuchâtel, Switzerland) is an absorbable hemostatic agent used for hemostasis in operation, although some surgeons use it to position free flap pedicles. The increasing risk of vessel compromise is a huge concern. However, no scientific data to date demonstrate the safety and benefit of using ORC in microvascular surgery. In the present study, we compared the outcome of microvascular head and neck reconstruction with and without pedicle placement using ORC.From January 2015 to December 2017, we reviewed patients undergoing microvascular surgery with free fibular osteocutaneous flap in our hospital. The patients were divided into the ORC group and non-ORC group and their baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared.In total, there were 27 patients in the ORC group and 67 in the non-ORC group. The non-ORC group had significantly higher cigarette consumption (70.4% vs. 89.6%; p = .022). The outcome of the ORC group was better regarding arterial thrombosis (0% vs. 3%), flap failure (0% vs. 4.5%), hematoma (7.4% vs. 10.4%), and wound complications (25.9% vs. 44.8%). The ORC group had a worse result than the non-ORC group for vein thrombosis (7.4% vs. 4.5%) and duration of hospitalization (24.111 days vs. 23.627 days). However, none of above results was significant.Though this study was underpowered to detect the differences, the results showed a trend toward better outcomes of flaps and wounds in the ORC group. It seems that using ORC in this field is safe and beneficial.
| Reference Key |
hsieh2019themicrosurgery
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Hsieh, Yu-Hsuan;Yang, Kuo-Chung;Liu, Wen-Chung;Kao, Chia-Chen;Chen, Lee-Wei;Lin, Cheng-Ta; |
| Journal | microsurgery |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1002/micr.30475
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.