Assessing the resilience of an IT portfolio.
Clicks: 399
ID: 45282
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
80.5
/100
399 views
260 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #2 of 7 articles by views in journal of business continuity & emergency planning
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
One of the goals of the business impact analysis (BIA) process is to establish recovery objectives. Having established recovery objectives, the next step is to assess whether one's IT portfolio can actually meet those objectives. Unfortunately, there is no well-defined and prescriptive process for this. This article describes a model that can be customised and applied in any organisation to take an IT-centric view to assessing resilience capabilities. The first stage of this process is to gather IT-specific data, either through a questionnaire or by querying the configuration management database directly. The next step is to leverage a set of scoring rubrics in order to assess the capabilities of each application with respect to meeting recovery point objectives, recovery time objectives and service-level targets, as well as the strength of staffing, documentation and disaster recovery plans. The output of the model is a composite score for each application (based upon an aggregate capability score and a weighting factor) that identifies those services in the IT portfolio with the greatest gaps in their capabilities (ie those services in greatest need of remediation). The logic of the model can either be built with spreadsheets or automated through business continuity management planning platforms.
| Reference Key |
ricks2019assessingjournal
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Ricks, Matthew;Boswell, Lucrecia; |
| Journal | journal of business continuity & emergency planning |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | URL not found |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.