Engaging but inaccurate: a cross-sectional analysis of acne videos on social media from non-healthcare sources.

Clicks: 537
ID: 44233
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #1 of 31 articles by views in Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract is not available for this article.
Login to Search Abstract
Reference Key
borba2019engagingjournal Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Borba, Andrea J;Young, Paulina M;Read, Charlotte;Armstrong, April W;
Journal Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Year 2019
DOI
S0190-9622(19)32609-X
URL
Keywords
social media internet dermatology quality information accuracy adolescents health engagement youtube online acne acne vulgaris

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.