COMPARATION OF WAREHOUSE RECEIPT, PAWN AND FIDUCIARY IN THE SECURITY LAW PERSPECTIVE

Clicks: 227
ID: 41604
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Warehouse Receipt System (WRS) has been used in Indonesia as an instruments of trade and finance to agribusiness commodities since the enactment of Law UU 9/2006 and PBI 9/2007. Bank Indonesia Regulation No 9 of 2007, Article 46 letter f, allows the use of Warehouse Receipt as a credit collateral. Implementation of Warehouse Receipt System is expected to help farmers, planters, fishermen who have often had difficulty costs at harvest time. As securities, Warehouse Receipt can also be used as an investment instrument in the commodity market. This research aims to find answers of three main problem. First, to examine legal position of Warehouse Receipt in Security Law perspective. Second, to examine differences and similarities of Warehouse Receipt collateral to the Pawn guarantees. Third, to examine differences and similarities between Warehouse Receipt collateral with Fiduciary guarantees. Key word : security law, warehouse receipt, pawn, fiduciary
Reference Key
hariyani2017comparationyustisia Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Hariyani, Iswi;
Journal yustisia
Year 2017
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.