Producing Fish Protein Hydrolysates from Mackerel By-Products
Clicks: 265
ID: 41238
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Star Article
79.7
/100
265 views
218 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
StarRanked #14 of 49 articles by views in frontiers in marine science
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Portugal is one of the largest consumers of fishery products in Europe. This consumption involves a large amount of discarded raw material, such as rejected fish in selling auctions and the generation of by-products in industrial production processes. The by-products in the canning industry alone reach 40% of the raw material, while the frozen fish industries may reach 10-50% of the raw material (INE, 2013).
Fish protein hydrolysates (FPH) are one of the most promising technologies for the recovery of these by-products (Kristinsson e Rasco, 2000). The present study aims to investigate the effect of different enzymes (0.5% Alcalase and 0.5% Neutrase®) and hydrolysis time (0, 60 and 120 minutes) in the characteristics of FPH obtained from mackerel canning by-products. The hydrolysates were characterized determining the nitrogen recovery, the degree of hydrolysis (DH), the fat recovery, the DPPH free radical scavenging activity, moisture and ash content.
Nitrogen recovery was significantly higher in FPH produced with Alcalase (17.35%) than in FPH produced with Neutrase® (3.58%). FPH produced using Neutrase® presented a higher DH, suggesting that this enzyme had a preference for soluble protein, whereas Alcalase will preferentially hydrolyze insoluble protein contained in the by-products.
The FPH produced with 0.5% of Alcalase® and 120 minutes showed the higher DPPH free radical scavenging activity (35.85±1.1%). It was observed that after 90 minutes of hydrolysis, DPPH free radical scavenging activity increased in almost all mackerel hydrolysates by 5.24%.
The results suggest that FPH may add value to currently discarded products and, furthermore, may enable the development of new functional products. The FPH may allow the transformation of previously low commercial value by-products into a source of profit.
Instituto Nacional de Estatística (INE), I. P. (2013), Estatísticas da Pesca 2012, Edição 2013, Lisboa, Portugal.
Kristinsson, H. G.; Rasco, B. A. (2000). Fish Protein Hydrolysates: Production, Biochemical and Functional Properties Critical Reviews, in Food Science and Nutrition, 40: 43-81.
| Reference Key |
augusto2014producingfrontiers
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Augusto, Ana Luísa De Sousa; |
| Journal | frontiers in marine science |
| Year | 2014 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.