Solutions for severely angulated implants in the mandibular overdenture: a clinical report.
Clicks: 326
ID: 41088
2009
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Star Article
76.1
/100
326 views
242 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
StarRanked #2 of 6 articles by views in journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the american college of prosthodontists
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Results of randomized clinical trials have confirmed that implant overdentures provide patients with better outcomes than do conventional complete dentures. Several designs have been introduced for the mandibular implant-retained removable prosthesis. The most commonly used prosthesis design for the mandibular overdenture is two implants in the canine areas with a stud attachment mechanism (i.e., ball attachments). This design is the least expensive, and therefore can service more patients and is now considered to be the "Standard of Care" for the mandibular edentulous patient. Proper treatment planning and execution lead to favorable implant placement and a successful prosthetic restoration and ultimately patient satisfaction; however, implant malposition may occur, which can lead to an unsuccessful prosthesis. This clinical report describes an implant overdenture design used for severely angled implants. Prosthodontic techniques that enabled this patient to have a successful outcome included the use of cast-to attachments and abutments along with a sectional matrix used to locate these components within the bulk of the prosthesis. For this patient the prosthodontic compromises were preferred over another surgical procedure with the additional time, discomfort, increased cost, and possible surgical morbidity. It is important that the patient understand the compromises and potential problems when implant placement is not ideal, especially the potential for implant overload and failure.
| Reference Key |
akkad2009solutionsjournal
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Akkad, Salem;Richards, Mark; |
| Journal | journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the american college of prosthodontists |
| Year | 2009 |
| DOI |
10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00400.x
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.