A force consistent method for electrostatic energy calculation in fluctuating charge model.

Clicks: 149
ID: 40776
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #113 of 129 articles by views in The Journal of Chemical Physics

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 129 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
A practical approach to include the polarization effect in a molecular force field is the fluctuating charge method in which atomic charges vary as the configuration of the molecular system changes. However, the use of the Coulomb formula to evaluate energy in a fluctuating charge method is theoretically inconsistent with the forces given by the fluctuating method. In this work, we propose a force-consistent method to correctly calculate electrostatic energies of molecular systems using a fluctuating charge model (Effective Polarizable Bond or EPB). In this protocol, the electrostatic energy is obtained by numerical interaction of the atomic forces along the MD trajectory, rather than using the default Coulomb formula in the EPB model. Test study on the benchmark Barnase-Barstar protein-protein interaction system demonstrates that although the total electrostatic energy of the system shows little deviation due to the averaging effect, specific residue-residue electrostatic interaction energy is affected and the level of the effect depends on the charges of the interacting residues with charged residues showing pronounced differences in calculated energies between using the current protocol and the standard Coulomb formula. It is recommended that the proposed numerical interaction method should be preferred in the calculation of electrostatic energy in fluctuating charge models used in molecular dynamics simulations.
Reference Key
duan2019athe Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Duan, Guanfu;Ji, Changge;Zhang, John Z H;
Journal The Journal of Chemical Physics
Year 2019
DOI
10.1063/1.5118224
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.