Understanding Quality in Research: Avoiding Predatory Journals.
Clicks: 227
ID: 40424
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
67.3
/100
220 views
179 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Peer-review publishing has long been the gold standard for disseminating research. The peer-review process holds researchers accountable for their work and conveys confidence that the article is of value to the reader. Predatory journals and publishing pose a global threat to the quality of scientific literature, accuracy of educational resources, and safety of patient care. Predatory publishing uses an exploitative business model, substandard quality control measures, and deceptive publishing practices. Given the proliferation of these journals and the extreme measures utilized to disguise substandard publishing practices, avoiding them can prove difficult. Understanding the nature of predatory publishing and how to recognize the warning signs provide helpful measures to authors, researchers, students, and readers. Additional resources known to help avoid predatory publishers have been discussed in addition to reviewing the Journal of Human Lactation guidelines for publishing.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (136 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
strong2019understandingjournal
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Strong, Genae; |
| Journal | journal of human lactation : official journal of international lactation consultant association |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1177/0890334419869912
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.