Upper Bound of Neutrino Masses from Combined Cosmological Observations and Particle Physics Experiments.

Clicks: 275
ID: 39671
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #106 of 298 articles by views in physical review letters

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 298 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
We investigate the impact of prior models on the upper bound of the sum of neutrino masses, ∑m_{ν}. Using data from the large scale structure of galaxies, cosmic microwave background, type Ia supernovae, and big bang nucleosynthesis, we argue that cosmological neutrino mass and hierarchy determination should be pursued using exact models, since approximations might lead to incorrect and nonphysical bounds. We compare constraints from physically motivated neutrino mass models (i.e., ones respecting oscillation experiments) to those from models using standard cosmological approximations. The former give a consistent upper bound of ∑m_{ν}≲0.26  eV (95% CI) and yield the first approximation-independent upper bound for the lightest neutrino mass species, m_{0}^{ν}<0.086  eV (95% CI). By contrast, one of the approximations, which is inconsistent with the known lower bounds from oscillation experiments, yields an upper bound of ∑m_{ν}≲0.15  eV (95% CI); this differs substantially from the physically motivated upper bound.
Reference Key
loureiro2019upperphysical Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal physical review letters
Year 2019
DOI
10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.081301
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.