DeepMalNet: Evaluating shallow and deep networks for static PE malware detection

Clicks: 389
ID: 39501
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #1 of 3 articles by views in ict express

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This paper primarily evaluates the efficacy of shallow and deep networks to statically detect malicious windows portable executable (PE) files. This uses recently released, labeled and benchmark data set, EMBER malware benchmark data set. As deep networks are parameterized, the parameters are chosen based on comparing the performance of various network parameters and network topologies over various trials of experiments. The experiments of such chosen efficient configurations of deep models are run up to 1000 epochs with varying learning rates between 0.01 and 0.5. The observed results of deep networks are high compared to the shallow networks. Keywords: Static analysis, Malicious and benign binaries and deep networks
Reference Key
r2018deepmalnetict Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors R., Vinayakumar;K.P., Soman;
Journal ict express
Year 2018
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.