Agricultural practices and quality of environment: evidence for global perspective.

Clicks: 144
ID: 39186
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #366 of 403 articles by views in Environmental science and pollution research international

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 403 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
The study emphasizes to examine the causal relationship among CO emission, agricultural value added, industrial production, urbanization, nuclear energy consumption, and economic growth across the panel of 59 countries. The data is collected from World Bank database over the period of 1982-2015. For econometric estimations, we have divided the sample into different income groups: low income, lower middle income, upper middle income, and higher income. In case of higher income countries, empirical results have reported the unidirectional causality from agricultural value added to CO emission, whereas, bidirectional causality between nuclear energy consumption and CO emission. Upper-middle-income countries have confirmed the bidirectional causality between CO emissions and agricultural added; however, unidirectional causality runs from nuclear consumption to CO emission. According to Granger causality estimations, agricultural value added and nuclear energy consumption do not cause the CO emission in low income and lower-middle-income countries. Long-run estimations have mentioned that higher agricultural value added leads to increase the CO2 emission, in upper middle income and higher income countries. On contrary, in case of low-income and lower-middle-income countries, agricultural value added has inverse relationship with CO emission. Higher nuclear energy consumption tends to reduce the CO emission, except the upper-middle-income countries.
Reference Key
anwar2019agriculturalenvironmental Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Anwar, Awais;Sarwar, Suleman;Amin, Waqas;Arshed, Noman;
Journal Environmental science and pollution research international
Year 2019
DOI
10.1007/s11356-019-04957-x
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.